5 years journey - Numbers that measure impact

Medhospital's performance reflects on its commitments. Since we are a non-fund raising and non-funding educational foundation, we cannot measure our performance by the number of projects we raised funds for or the number of people we funded. Our yardstick for evaluation is how well we reached our audience, and what was their feedback. The controversial issues project was the last we started and we are still working on its initiatives. I will keep it out from this analysis and discuss it in the next section. I will take statistics (analyzed using Webalizer) from the past years and discuss these indicators in detail.

Visits

Figure 1. Viewer preference

 
Feedbacks

Every article has a feedback form at the end having two components; the viewer's specific comments and the viewer's rating of the article. Specific comments are used to review the article while the rating is used to analyze how well we wrote it. Any article that gets a rating below 3 is rewritten. The sections that received maximum number of reexaminations and attention from our viewers, we rate those sections the most well performed. Figure 2. shows the performance summary. Interestingly, we received maximum questions, comments and article feedbacks from the Human Body Project. The viewer's comments mainly came from Teen's Health and Our Body sections.

Figure 2. Project performance

 
World reach

We also looked at the various countries from where people are accessing our websites. This was primarily done to see if we needed to address certain issues that were inherently more pronounced in certain parts of the world. Figure 3. summarizes the geographic distribution of our visitors. As the figures show, majority of our visitors are from Asia followed by North America.

Figure 3. Geographic distribution of visitors

© Medhospital Foundation